What If We Measured Learning Through Skills Gained, Not Time Spent in the Classroom?

For more than 100 years, high schools and colleges have relied on the same stalwart tool to measure teaching and learning: the clock. That’s because earning credit toward a diploma or degree typically requires students to spend a minimum number of hours receiving instruction in the classroom.

Now, the institution that developed the time-based standard more than a century ago that is used throughout education is calling for the creation of a different way to quantify academic progress. This week, the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching — the folks who brought us the Carnegie Unit, the basic segment of time measurement in many degree programs, in 1906 — announced its intentions to change that currency of learning from “seat time” to “skills.”

Read more on EdSurge…

You Might Like

Carnegie Foundation and ETS Release Skills Progressions for Collaboration, Communication and Critical Thinking 

Read more

Rising Demand for Career Education Prompts College Board to Expand Its Footprint

Read more

Leading an Opportunity College and University: A Q&A with President Parham from Cal State University, Dominguez Hills

Read more

Podcast: The Next 50 Years of Higher Ed – What Leaders Need to Know

Read more